Can Blueshirt Sophomores Avoid Dreaded Jinx?

Get those good luck talismans ready.

Every sports fan knows that when a player has a successful rookie campaign they often then suffer from what is known as the, “Dreaded Sophomore Jinx.”

What might this age old jinx have to do with the New York Rangers? Everything!
Jimmy Vesey, Pavel Buchnevich, and Brady Skjei all had quality rookie seasons last year, and are thus in need of some anti-jinx repellent. 
If the Rangers are to achieve their goal of winning the Stanley Cup, they are going to need strong seasons from each of Vesey, Buchnevich, and Skjei.

 

BRADY SKJEI

 

Skjei

Last year, Brady Skjei dealt with what can only be described as a tale of two halves. From Opening Night to the All-Star break, Brady was among the worst defensemen in the League. Then the light went on. From the break, through the end of the regular season, Skjei was an indomitable force on the Rangers’ blue line.

Skjei would continue his resurgent play in the postseason, where he and partner Brendan Smith, formed the Rangers’ most dynamic and reliable backline duo.
So, which Brady is the real Skjei? Is it first-half, doesn’t belong in the NHL Brady? Or is it the guy who elicited comparisons to captain Ryan McDonagh and other top NHL defensemen?
My guess is that it just took awhile for Skjei to get comfortable in the NHL and once he did, he was a force to be reckoned with. This isn’t uncommon in athletes — even the best — and it’s certainly understandable. 
Brady is being counted on to man the left-side of the Rangers’ second defense unit — Brendan Smith will be on the right — and that will allow him to continue to learn and grow, all while racking up points at an impressive rate. A rate not seen in a Rangers’ sweater since Brian Leetch was a rookie.
Pavel Buchnevich

Buchnevich (Getty)

Here’s one guy who can’t get more jinxed than he already is. Pavel recorded an assist in his NHL debut. Then, after playing one more game, was sent to IR for two-weeks with back spasms. When he returned, Buchnevich was a man on a mission.

The Russian sniper netted four goals and three assists in nine games. Then, it was back to the IR with more back issues. This time, his back kept him out for two-months. When he returned he once again was on a mission. Buch potted two goals and four assists in four games. Then the All-Star break hit and Pavel’s promising comeback was derailed, this time due to his coach rather than an injury.
Alain Vigneault has proven throughout his career that he has little patience with young players. If he’s expected to win it all, then he needs players with track records that are capable of playing in his system.
Buchnevich was relegated to regular fourth-line duty. When the postseason came along, he found himself sent to the press box — replaced in the lineup by Tanner GlassWhile Buch did eventually see action in the playoffs he only appeared in five games, making minimal contributions.
For Pavel to avoid stunting his development any further he needs to get healthy and remain that way. The skill and talent are there, it’s just a matter of keeping him on the ice. If he does, there’s no reason he can’t be another Alex Kovalev for the Blueshirts. Another Kovalev? Well we all know what that led to last time.
Jimmy Vesey

Credit: Bruce Bennett/Getty Images

This former Hobey Baker Award recipient needs to figure out how to translate his college game to the NHL. After making an early splash with six goals and three assists in his first 10-games, Vesey went ice cold, like colder then the Arctic Circle. In his next 70 games, Vesey recorded just 10-goals and eight assists. In the playoffs, he would add a goal and three assists to his hockey card.

Despite playing with Derek Stepan and Rick Nash for most of the season, Vesey did not develop as many initially thought he would. Still, it’s early and Hobey Baker winners generally turn into solid NHLers.

Avoiding the Jinx

 

Each of the trio struggled at times during their rookie campaigns, but each managed to at least show signs of potential growth. Brady Skjei is the likeliest to emerge as a stud in his sophomore season. Buchnevich has the most talent, while Vesey has the most to learn.
These three need to avoid the jinx and grow into productive NHL players. That would then mean the Rangers will be primed for a nice celebration. If not, well hey at least there’s more people on the team then just them right? All jokes aside, the Rangers need this trio to step up and continue to grow. After all there’s nothing more important than good young cost-controlled talent in the hard cap system created by the NHL.
This post originally appeared on nysports247.blogspot.com

3 comments

  • I think you need to calm down with the comparissions. Listen Brady Skjei was very good especially down the stretch but to compare him to Brian Leetch is maddening. Leetch was an all time great who scored over 100 points in a season,won a Conn Smyth, scored over 1000 pts and is a Hall of Famer.

    Alex Kovalev like Leetch scored over 1000 points in his career and at times was a dynamic player. There were times where he was one of the top stick handlers/danglers in the league. Buch hadn’t shown anything like that at all in his short time as a Ranger.

    Give Skjei and Buch time to grow into the players they can become and not put undue pressure on them to perform up to players who produced over 1000 points in their career. Let’s be honest, Skjei and Buch will NEVER put up that many points in their careers.

  • Sorry I do not stand the Skeji poor first half thing, now I am only going by the basic stats pts and +/- but its about equal. I do agree his second half was better all around in his game defensively an so on but to say his first half he was and I quote (Brady was among the worst defensemen in the League) is a little crazy. The all star break was the Jan. 29th last season at that point Skeji was +4 with 20 points and after the break he had 19 points and was +2 two. Again I didn’t check possession numbers or anything and i do agree in the playoffs he really step and I agree that he game got better as the season when but to say it was that bad to me is a stretch as is saying he could be Brian Leetch.

    • understand*^ ( also in comparison Mac had 28 pts and +10 at the break, and he had an excellent first half so Skeji 20 pts and +4 was terrible I am sorry that just doesn’t make sense to me)

We would love your thoughts! Comment Please!